Why Amazon sued the United States in 1114 single brush off rather than the direct deletion of the f

Why Amazon sued the United States in 1114 single brush off rather than the direct deletion of the f

Category : reljmhpc

Abstract: since Amazon already know these users to publish false comments, why not cancel the account or delete comments? And to sue

go to war?

 

"1114".

this is the electricity supplier giant Amazon sued in the United States alleged in its platform paid publishing false criticism of the "network navy" number.

days ago, American business tycoon Amazon sued 1114 people in the Seattle court, accused of false comments they paid to release all kinds of products and services on the site, damage to the Amazon company’s brand and reputation.

it is understood that in the Amazon lawsuit, the 1114 defendants are collectively referred to as "John · as" (JohnDoes). These people provide false comments post service, in the 5 dollar website (Fiverr.com) on the price of $5 for the sale of a seller’s products leave the best level of the symbol of the "five star" comment service.

Amazon indictment pointed out that although the number of these comments is not much, but seriously undermined the trust of consumers, the vast majority of sellers and manufacturers of the amazon. Amazon also said that it has been noted that the false score sellers trying to use different IP address accounts to avoid inspection.

many people will say that this is not the "network navy" or "brush off"? If Amazon has known these users to publish false comments, why not cancel the account or delete comments? And to sue

go to war?

prosecution brush off: Amazon pay more attention to the effect of reputation

In fact,

, according to the Amazon user registration agreement, the registered account, Amazon reserves the right to refuse to provide their own services, close the account, delete or edit content or cancel the right to order. While commenting on the user, Amazon reserves the right to clear or edit the content (but not the obligation), but not the contents of the posted regular review.

simply said, for alleged violations of the user account or user comments, Amazon can be based on the user agreement and the user’s comments on the contents of the comments. But, for the "network navy" or "brush off", these users to publish content is illegal or infringement, is relatively vague or need to be confirmed.

in general, "network navy" or "brush off" to provide paid review publishing services, published content is basically positive evaluation of the product or business, the content is basically not on commodity or business tort.

, however, due to the content is paid release, with the nature of advertising, will be misleading to potential users to buy, so as to protect the interests of consumers or businesses benefit. The Amazon as an electronic business platform, if the purchase of goods on the platform evaluation is false, then the number of users to buy


Leave a Reply

Recent Comments